<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Nikon D2X: A Review Three Years Too Late</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.subtleimages.com/blog/2008/01/20/the-nikon-d2x-a-review-three-years-too-late/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.subtleimages.com/blog/2008/01/20/the-nikon-d2x-a-review-three-years-too-late/</link>
	<description>...because my life is just as boring as yours.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:44:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian McKay</title>
		<link>http://www.subtleimages.com/blog/2008/01/20/the-nikon-d2x-a-review-three-years-too-late/comment-page-1/#comment-16222</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian McKay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 16:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subtleimages.com/blog/2008/01/20/the-nikon-d2x-a-review-three-years-too-late/#comment-16222</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve made-do with two D100s (pathetic, I know) since 2002. I just received a D2X that I bought via eBay for $1275 + postage, and I love it. Apparently it&#039;s one of the last D2X made and was a &#039;dentist&#039;s camera,&#039; because it&#039;s pristine, with only 798 shutter actuations. Everyone else seems to be salivating over D3, D700 and D300, but this mint-condition DX-format body cost me so much less!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve made-do with two D100s (pathetic, I know) since 2002. I just received a D2X that I bought via eBay for $1275 + postage, and I love it. Apparently it&#8217;s one of the last D2X made and was a &#8216;dentist&#8217;s camera,&#8217; because it&#8217;s pristine, with only 798 shutter actuations. Everyone else seems to be salivating over D3, D700 and D300, but this mint-condition DX-format body cost me so much less!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayson Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.subtleimages.com/blog/2008/01/20/the-nikon-d2x-a-review-three-years-too-late/comment-page-1/#comment-15093</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayson Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subtleimages.com/blog/2008/01/20/the-nikon-d2x-a-review-three-years-too-late/#comment-15093</guid>
		<description>I have owned a D2X for about 18 months now.  I bought it because of it&#039;s indestructible build and features you mentioned.  It is NOT a lightweight to carry all day, but I do (with the able assistance of a monopod) I am enjoying it and would not give it up.  UUMM about the focus problems......yup I have them too.

Jayson Jones
Columbus, OH, USA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have owned a D2X for about 18 months now.  I bought it because of it&#8217;s indestructible build and features you mentioned.  It is NOT a lightweight to carry all day, but I do (with the able assistance of a monopod) I am enjoying it and would not give it up.  UUMM about the focus problems&#8230;&#8230;yup I have them too.</p>
<p>Jayson Jones<br />
Columbus, OH, USA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dalegaspi</title>
		<link>http://www.subtleimages.com/blog/2008/01/20/the-nikon-d2x-a-review-three-years-too-late/comment-page-1/#comment-14415</link>
		<dc:creator>dalegaspi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subtleimages.com/blog/2008/01/20/the-nikon-d2x-a-review-three-years-too-late/#comment-14415</guid>
		<description>John, I only speak of the D200.  Yes, I use a calibrated monitor (with Gretag-MacBeth Eye-One)...checking the color histogram in Photoshop shows that color shift, too.

BUT...i would say that the magenta bias is more apparent when used in conjunction with Capture NX...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, I only speak of the D200.  Yes, I use a calibrated monitor (with Gretag-MacBeth Eye-One)&#8230;checking the color histogram in Photoshop shows that color shift, too.</p>
<p>BUT&#8230;i would say that the magenta bias is more apparent when used in conjunction with Capture NX&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.subtleimages.com/blog/2008/01/20/the-nikon-d2x-a-review-three-years-too-late/comment-page-1/#comment-14414</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subtleimages.com/blog/2008/01/20/the-nikon-d2x-a-review-three-years-too-late/#comment-14414</guid>
		<description>Nikon DSLR&#039;s magenta biased?? Never heard that one before. My D70 tends err toward the cyan fairly regularly, never even remotely magenta. Are you using a calibrated monitor? If not, it&#039;s probably your monitor that&#039;s off, not your cameras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon DSLR&#8217;s magenta biased?? Never heard that one before. My D70 tends err toward the cyan fairly regularly, never even remotely magenta. Are you using a calibrated monitor? If not, it&#8217;s probably your monitor that&#8217;s off, not your cameras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.subtleimages.com/blog/2008/01/20/the-nikon-d2x-a-review-three-years-too-late/comment-page-1/#comment-14413</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subtleimages.com/blog/2008/01/20/the-nikon-d2x-a-review-three-years-too-late/#comment-14413</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the very objective review.  I am an upgrade behind you, having switched over to digital Nikons with a D70 in late 2004.  I just got a D200 last summer.  While I covet the higher ISO performance of the D3 and its sibling D300, I may have to wait for the next generation, the D400? before moving up.  But reading your findings, the D2X or D2X(s) looks like an excellent candidate for an additional body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the very objective review.  I am an upgrade behind you, having switched over to digital Nikons with a D70 in late 2004.  I just got a D200 last summer.  While I covet the higher ISO performance of the D3 and its sibling D300, I may have to wait for the next generation, the D400? before moving up.  But reading your findings, the D2X or D2X(s) looks like an excellent candidate for an additional body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dalegaspi</title>
		<link>http://www.subtleimages.com/blog/2008/01/20/the-nikon-d2x-a-review-three-years-too-late/comment-page-1/#comment-14365</link>
		<dc:creator>dalegaspi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subtleimages.com/blog/2008/01/20/the-nikon-d2x-a-review-three-years-too-late/#comment-14365</guid>
		<description>^^^ I have updated the review to reflect these additional D300 features.  Thanks for dropping by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^^ I have updated the review to reflect these additional D300 features.  Thanks for dropping by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.subtleimages.com/blog/2008/01/20/the-nikon-d2x-a-review-three-years-too-late/comment-page-1/#comment-14363</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.subtleimages.com/blog/2008/01/20/the-nikon-d2x-a-review-three-years-too-late/#comment-14363</guid>
		<description>You omitted a number of other D300 advantages: (1) Superior jpegs (no more RAW except for extreme situations or the desire for a backup) (2) CA correction (3) Focus fine-tuning (4) many better AF features - not just for sports.

The list goes on....nice try!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You omitted a number of other D300 advantages: (1) Superior jpegs (no more RAW except for extreme situations or the desire for a backup) (2) CA correction (3) Focus fine-tuning (4) many better AF features &#8211; not just for sports.</p>
<p>The list goes on&#8230;.nice try!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
